René Geppert
03-12-2008, 17:55
im folgenden minimalbeispiel wird eine fußnote über eine seite hinweg umbrochen...
ich habs mal versucht soweit runterzubrechen wie möglich, ohne dass das problem "verschwindet"
sorry für den vielen text, aber muss man ja nicht lesen :D
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper,oneside]{scrreprt}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[ansinew]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english=american,babel]{csquotes}
\usepackage{blindtext}
\usepackage{gmeometric}
\geometry{outer=15mm, inner=50mm, top=25mm, bottom=30mm}
\usepackage{setspace}
\onehalfspacing
\usepackage[style=verbose]{biblatex}
\bibliography{references}
\deffootnote{2.5em}
{1em}
{\makebox[2em]
[r]
{\thefootnotemark}
\hspace{1em}
}
\begin{document}
\tableofcontents
\newpage
\chapter{background}
\section{Development of foo}
------\\
------\\
------\\
------\\
------
\subsection{aaa}
\blindtext\footcite{Draft2004} \blindtext\footcite[here p. 13]{Draft2005} yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda participants' perceptions.
The initial date of effectiveness for the Statement on fair value measurement was November 15, 2006. As a result of discussions and potential implementation issues, e.\,g.\ related to FASB Statement No.~141, \textit{Business Combinations}, the effectve date of SFAS No.~157 was delayed by one year. The statement is, hende, effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Further implementation issues related to the fair value measuremenet of certain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities had the FASB delay the effective date for those instruments to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. This relates especially to assets and liablities acquired in a business combinations or whose determination of impairment heavily depends on unobservable inputs. The partial deferral will give financial statement preparers more time to deal with these isses without eliminating the statement's improvements in financial reporting.\footcite[here p. 1--2]{FSP2}
FSP FAS 157-3 was a response on constituents' concerns that Statement 157 does not provide sufficient guidance on how to measure fair values in markets that are not active. These issues especially rose the question how own assumptions are to be considered when markets are not active, how available observable inputs from inactive markets should be considered and how market quotes are to be considered with regard to the relevance of observable and unobservale inputs from inactive markets. The staff position clarifies that even in a situation of dislocated markets not every transaction can be seen as a distressed sale. On the other hand, it is also not appropriate to regard every transaction price to be equal the instrument's fair value. Determining fair values requires judgement about whether transaction represent distressed sales or an orderly transaction (exit price notion). The FASB also concluded that own assumptions about future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates are acceptable when relevante observable inputs are not available. For example an entity might consider using Level 3 inputs if observable Level 2 inputs would require significant adjustments based on unobservable inputs.\footcite{FSP3}
SFAS No.~157 basically comprises two important topics. At first it gives clarification on the terminology associated with \emph{fair value}. This gives appliers of US-GAAP a consistent definition to be used wherever fair value is the relevant measure. Statement 157 establishes a single definition of fair value and a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles that should result in increased consistency and comparabilitiy in fair value measurements. Statement 157 also expands disclosures about fair value measurements, improving the quality of information provided to users of financial statements, increasing transparency, and enhancing comparability of financial statements. Statement 157, however, does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS 157 defines: Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.\footcite[\nopp157.5]{FAS157}
This is an important distinction from prior partly inconsistent
\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{References}
\printbibliography
\end{document}
das problem entsteht aus dem zusammenspiel von
\deffootnote{2.5em}
{1em}
{\makebox[2em]
[r]
{\thefootnotemark}
\hspace{1em}
} mit den seitenrändern etc.
das minimalbeispiel oben zeigt wie die letzte fußnote über 2 seiten umbrochen wird
ist irgendwas an dem \deffootnote-Befehl falsch oder sieht jemand einen Fehler? Bin da echt grad am verzweifeln...
btw - einfach den text ändern, dass es irgendwie passt, geht natürlich auch nur solange gut, bis es irgendwann wieder nicht mehr passt
hier die bibdatei:
ich habs mal versucht soweit runterzubrechen wie möglich, ohne dass das problem "verschwindet"
sorry für den vielen text, aber muss man ja nicht lesen :D
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper,oneside]{scrreprt}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[ansinew]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english=american,babel]{csquotes}
\usepackage{blindtext}
\usepackage{gmeometric}
\geometry{outer=15mm, inner=50mm, top=25mm, bottom=30mm}
\usepackage{setspace}
\onehalfspacing
\usepackage[style=verbose]{biblatex}
\bibliography{references}
\deffootnote{2.5em}
{1em}
{\makebox[2em]
[r]
{\thefootnotemark}
\hspace{1em}
}
\begin{document}
\tableofcontents
\newpage
\chapter{background}
\section{Development of foo}
------\\
------\\
------\\
------\\
------
\subsection{aaa}
\blindtext\footcite{Draft2004} \blindtext\footcite[here p. 13]{Draft2005} yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda participants' perceptions.
The initial date of effectiveness for the Statement on fair value measurement was November 15, 2006. As a result of discussions and potential implementation issues, e.\,g.\ related to FASB Statement No.~141, \textit{Business Combinations}, the effectve date of SFAS No.~157 was delayed by one year. The statement is, hende, effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Further implementation issues related to the fair value measuremenet of certain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities had the FASB delay the effective date for those instruments to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. This relates especially to assets and liablities acquired in a business combinations or whose determination of impairment heavily depends on unobservable inputs. The partial deferral will give financial statement preparers more time to deal with these isses without eliminating the statement's improvements in financial reporting.\footcite[here p. 1--2]{FSP2}
FSP FAS 157-3 was a response on constituents' concerns that Statement 157 does not provide sufficient guidance on how to measure fair values in markets that are not active. These issues especially rose the question how own assumptions are to be considered when markets are not active, how available observable inputs from inactive markets should be considered and how market quotes are to be considered with regard to the relevance of observable and unobservale inputs from inactive markets. The staff position clarifies that even in a situation of dislocated markets not every transaction can be seen as a distressed sale. On the other hand, it is also not appropriate to regard every transaction price to be equal the instrument's fair value. Determining fair values requires judgement about whether transaction represent distressed sales or an orderly transaction (exit price notion). The FASB also concluded that own assumptions about future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates are acceptable when relevante observable inputs are not available. For example an entity might consider using Level 3 inputs if observable Level 2 inputs would require significant adjustments based on unobservable inputs.\footcite{FSP3}
SFAS No.~157 basically comprises two important topics. At first it gives clarification on the terminology associated with \emph{fair value}. This gives appliers of US-GAAP a consistent definition to be used wherever fair value is the relevant measure. Statement 157 establishes a single definition of fair value and a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles that should result in increased consistency and comparabilitiy in fair value measurements. Statement 157 also expands disclosures about fair value measurements, improving the quality of information provided to users of financial statements, increasing transparency, and enhancing comparability of financial statements. Statement 157, however, does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS 157 defines: Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.\footcite[\nopp157.5]{FAS157}
This is an important distinction from prior partly inconsistent
\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{References}
\printbibliography
\end{document}
das problem entsteht aus dem zusammenspiel von
\deffootnote{2.5em}
{1em}
{\makebox[2em]
[r]
{\thefootnotemark}
\hspace{1em}
} mit den seitenrändern etc.
das minimalbeispiel oben zeigt wie die letzte fußnote über 2 seiten umbrochen wird
ist irgendwas an dem \deffootnote-Befehl falsch oder sieht jemand einen Fehler? Bin da echt grad am verzweifeln...
btw - einfach den text ändern, dass es irgendwie passt, geht natürlich auch nur solange gut, bis es irgendwann wieder nicht mehr passt
hier die bibdatei: